creigs1707 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anthony: You might do well to first of all learn
> what they're really called.
>
> SC: Do these 'concavities' not bisect the
> pyramids? Well I guess with 'bsectors' you knew
> what I was talking about anyways, right?
>


Yes, but a book's index will not understand what you mean when you use the wrong word to describe something.



> Anthony: ...you can find why they really exist.
>
> SC: Hate to break it to you - I already figured
> that out.


No, you haven't. Not in the least.


> and what I figured out you won't find
> in ANY text book. But I don't think that will
> surprise you.


Of course not. It's wrong. Then again, lots of wrong things are published in texst books.

Of course, I never actually mentioned "text books" as a resource you should use. They are notoriously out of date.



>
> Anthony: Good luck with your studies
>
> SC: Thank you.
>
> Anthony: I'll be happy to help. I have no problem
> dealing with truly open minded people.
>
> SC: Likewise. So tell me - since you said you'd
> help. What IS the purpose of those bisectors -
> sorry, concavities?

They are neither bisectors nor concavities.

The rest will be up to you to work out from your research of fact, not fiction.



Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.