creigs1707 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> L-H: ...giving their interpretation of it...
>
> SC: And this is precisely the crux of the issue,
> isn't it. Interpretations.

No the crux is real evidence. You have none. Those "mean old egyptologist" have evidence that shows the AE, and only the AE, designed and built the pyramids, period. No LC anywhere.
Since you have not one single piece of evidence for your LC designing the pyramid your idea is purely fictional and always will be until you bring forth real evidence of this LC and not your imaginary pattern designed by you on a diagram of the giza plateau.
As this is a place to weigh evidence, and you have none, I see this continuous reposting of the same thing as nothing more then special pleading.

> I have never doubted
> that the AEs constructed these monuments at Giza
> and neither have I disputed that they did not use
> them in the manner described by orthodox AE. What
> I am saying is that my intepretation sees MORE -
> much, much more.

Your interpretation is a fictional belief poorly structured as a "theory" based on zero evidence and only fictional stories twisted to fit.
You always strut out this part as if that is what is being disagreed with and you know it isn't. It is your patently, unevidenced claim of a LC designing it.
There is evidence for the AE being the designers of the pyramids agreed upon by those who study the culture for a living.
You have no evidence for a LC and argue against the evidence at hand with no, or very little, understanding of the culture in question.


> I do not believe the
> interpretation I offer can be so easily dismissed
> simply because you refuse to accept it even
> exists.

Oh it exist, in your mind. As far as being dismissed, it was dismissed as soon as you admitted no evidence other then the idea you created after reading books with similar stories. No evidence for a LC and all goes for you and your made on the fly ideas.

> The correlation is there, I have shown
> this.

AS has been said many times before here correlation is not causation. Heck I don't think you even have a correlation.

> That some would rather keep their heads in
> a sarcophagus than think outside the box and
> consider my interpretation as evidence truly is
> the real barrier to enlightenment.

Simply put, your idea has no evidence for any part of it, period. You simply believe it, imagine it, interpret it, and fictionalize it but the one thing you have not done is prove it with any real evidence but only a pattern made by your imagination.


Lobo-hotei
lobo

Treat the earth well, It was not given to you by your parents, It was loaned to you by your children.
Native American Proverb