Graham,
> The 45 degrees is what we find on the ground at
> Giza.
But, previously, you quoted an angle of 37.715 degrees ...
> I have attempted a cultural interpretation of it.
Well, you can either be in favour of cultural interpretations, or opposed to them, but you cannot be both. You haven't provided a cultural interpretation of the alleged 45 degree alignment. I suggest that the reason for this is because no such interpretation exists.
> Chris Tedders post was not about corners.
I must apologise - there were confusing typos in my own post, which I've now updated.
>I don't go for the corner alignment idea anyway.
OK ...
> Please exactly relate my proof to Wikipedia for
> us, as I have asked so many times.
The Wikipedia page outlines the nature of mathematical proofs; you claim to have a mathematical proof. So the onus is now on you to demonstrate that you are indeed in possession of that mathematical proof.
Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at
Rules and Guidelines
hallofmaatforum@proton.me
