Graham,

> What do you mean by textual support for angles ?

You claim that the 45 degrees come from the PTs –

Quote

The 45 degree axis of Giza aligned the structures with Iunu (Heliopolis) the temple of the sun. This is supported by related funeary texts.

However, all that you've been able to provide in support of that is something to the effect that "the king comes from Iunu". It's on this flimsy basis that you are applying the alleged 45 degree alignment between Giza and Heliopolis.

> What is this rule that "what appiies to one site
> must apply to all sites" ?

It's very simple. If the angle between Giza and Heliopolis defines the Giza layout, pyramid sizes, etc., then the angles formed between Abusir and Heliopolis, Dahshur and Heliopolis, etc., must also define those layouts and pyramid sizes. Furthermore, exactly the same method must be applied in each case.

> The thing to look for is the underlying religious
> ideas, and is the context right.

Could you please provide detailed contemporary textual support to the effect that pyramid locations and sizes are defined by this type of maths/geometry?

Since you read Mathematics at university, you should understand mathematical proofs. You should also, therefore, be well aware that all that you're doing is finding a fit for an existing data-set. As I mentioned in another post, the Internet is full of such attempts.

I repeat: can you provide detailed contemporary textual support?

Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at

Rules and Guidelines

hallofmaatforum@proton.me