Sorry Clive, you are wrong. Anyone can put something into print but I prefer to do so in a manner that convinces amateurs and professionals alike i.e. is properly peer reviewed. This website was born on the premis that if someone publishes, then they must stand by what they have published. My knowledge of AE is limited but in certain areas I have the advantage.

Nine years ago I spent as much time on trying to get a mere ten minutes with an Egyptoligist or even an archeologist, to discuss what are very basic, non-controversial conclusions. Result, "not an expert in this area", "talk to the British Museum", "require a panel of five people to agree with you before I'll discuss the matter".

There is much in print that is wrong. Herodotus has been described as both the "Father of History" and the "Father of Lies".

I have discovered some of the answers and they are really nothing special (in my mind). However, if one knows some of the answers they lead to greater discoveries. As a hobby, I proceed at a steady pace to produce these "discoveries". No doubt those with a greater knowledge (which includes many on this site) could have produced better answers in a fraction of the time.

Not published = don't know? What have you published, Clive, other that what is on websites and is not peer reviewed? Does this mean that I should ignore anything that you post. I hope not as you may have something worthwhile to put forward.





David

"When you do not know where you are going, any road will take you there".