The individual who had made the claim about the layouts has said that I mis-stated his case. I have of course invited him to please come to Ma'at and lay out his theory in all its details for your examination.

This is part of his response:

"Clearly, they were NOT limiting their responses to post-1600 BC structures. Besides, archy assign "religious" purpose to everything they find anywhere, as they are bereft of the technical knowledge to see the practical uses, i.e. ore processing.) Egypt remained POLYtheistic, so had many temple designs, as did the Greeks for the same reason. (Only Moses created monotheism which required a fixed temple design, copied by some early spinoffs.) His "Hall of Maat" boys would be aware that Maat was a godESS, worshipped along with Osiris and Thoth - each with their own dedicated temples. Bringing in the Americas was ludicrous - I know a Holy Roller church in Appalachia that didn't use the design either. This is pure, unadulterated obfuscation!"


The sizes, shapes, and relative geometric relationships of various rooms and open areas of temples were the SAME because the "gods"/aliens mandated the design.

[www.zechariasitchin.com]




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/27/2007 02:53PM by Hans.