Off Topic (reason for re-introducing the debate):

Dear Anthony,
Sorry for the old material. I was thinking that not everybody is familiar with Davidovits free publications. I am thankful to see someone else who has researched the subject. Also, thank you for your posts and involvement in the "New Debate" on "old material". I have no new information to offer. Just my conjectures like everyone else... and my own research. Morris's book has more information than I will offer... but I don't endorse buying it to anyone. I don't think it is necessary to buy in order to re-introduce the topic or present the theory.

Morris and Davidovits have presented a lot of information, with a lot of questions answered as free material. I read through the Morris debate here a few years ago. Excellent source of information. Great Debate. There seemed to be a personality conflict between Colin Reader and Margaret Morris. He came off as dismissive. It was his job to be a skeptic; he did a good job. Morris came off as "Duh, why didn't you read my book?" Looking past these problems, the debate was very informative. Because of the personality conflict, I thought I would re-introduce the topic in a non-confrontational way.

It is an interesting theory... which is under-developed. I will do my best to re-hash answers to questions... so that this theory is not "totally discredited". If it turns out to be "totally discredited", then that's fine too. One less thing to waste time on. I am curious to learn, "Why this theory doesn't work... why it is discredited... rather than unproven." Learning what is unproven, and how would you prove it or disprove it is informative as well.



Edited 8 time(s). Last edit at 12/07/2006 09:58PM by rich.