rich Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Great Point Anthony. What is the point of a crazy
> theory with no evidence?
>
> Davidovits has offered "some" evidence for his
> theory.
> 1. He created a "roman concrete" block in Egypt,
> that looks like a pyramid block. (This, however,
> does not show the pyramid was made this way.)
> Video:
>


Yeah, and umm.... he's the only one who has been allowed to examine it, if I recall... and the only one who knows the "secret ingredients" that he uses as proof that they are the same. He's hidden his real data.

Why?

See my sig below for a good guess.





> 2. Xray analyses of the pyramids:
>


Yawn. Anybody can tweak selective evidence to say what they want it to say.




>
> 3. Recent NY Times article:
>
> "From the geochemical mix of lime, sand and clay,
> they concluded, “the simplest explanation” is that
> it was cast concrete."


Yes, well... it was not cast concrete, but sedimentary stone.

Also, we don't know if the sample they used came from a specific area where mortar HAD been employed to hold the two pieces of quarried stone together.

This whole thing is a smoke and mirrors stage show... all illusion, no substance.

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.