Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 14, 2024, 7:27 pm UTC    
November 12, 2006 11:37PM
Don Barone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Bernard thanks for the info.
>
> But you said ... but in its original placement it
> would be face down in contact with the earth . Do
> you mean that the image itself would be laying
> face down so that the back was upward ?

If it fitted the pattern of other samples of this image, yes.

Where
> would it have been placed ? On the floor of what
> ?

On just the basis of what I can see, I don't know.
Bernard
>
> Best
> Don Barone


Subject Author Posted

Are Other Atrifacts Being Misread As Well ?

Don Barone November 12, 2006 07:12PM

Re: Are Other Atrifacts Being Misread As Well ?

Dave L November 12, 2006 07:16PM

Re: Are Other Atrifacts Being Misread As Well ?

Khazar-khum November 12, 2006 07:24PM

Re: Are Other Atrifacts Being Misread As Well ?

Greg Reeder November 12, 2006 07:28PM

Re: Are Other Atrifacts Being Misread As Well ?

Don Barone November 12, 2006 07:51PM

Re: Are Other Atrifacts Being Misread As Well ?

bernard November 12, 2006 08:22PM

Re: Are Other Atrifacts Being Misread As Well ?

Don Barone November 12, 2006 09:30PM

Re: Are Other Atrifacts Being Misread As Well ?

bernard November 12, 2006 11:37PM

Re: Are Other Atrifacts Being Misread As Well ?

Byrd November 13, 2006 12:13AM

Re: Are Other Atrifacts Being Misread As Well ?

C Wayne Taylor November 13, 2006 07:10AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login