Language and smoke and mirrors.

This is the real deal. Citation below.

<<<VanLandingham, S.L., 2006, Diatom evidence for autochthonous artifact deposition in the Valsequillo region, Puebla, Mexico during the Sangamonian (sensu lato = 80,000 to ca 220,000 yr BP and Illinoian (220,000 to 430,000 yr BP). J. Paleolimnol, 36, 101-116.


Journal of Paleolimnology
Diatom evidence for autochthonous artifact deposition in the Valsequillo region, Puebla, Mexico during the Sangamonian (sensu lato = 80,000 to ca. 220,000 yr BP and Illinoian (220,000 to 430,000 yr BP))
Journal Journal of Paleolimnology
Publisher Springer Netherlands
ISSN 0921-2728 (Print) 1573-0417 (Online)
Subject Earth and Environmental Science
Issue Volume 36, Number 1 / July, 2006
Category Original Paper
DOI 10.1007/s10933-006-0008-4
Pages 101-116
Online Date Saturday, July 29, 2006


Here we have a mainstream science journal publishing a well-reasoned paper, written by a well-respected paleontologist, arguing for human existence in North America between 220,000 BP-430,000 BP. In light of the 335,000 BP report to Caltrans and the 400,000 BP report from the U.K. by well respected, mainstream paleontologists and archeologists, I think any open minded individual must seriously consider the plausibility of human existence in North America contemporaneously with the earliest of Neanderthals and the latter of Homo heidelbergensis>>>

And not Paul's footsteps.