This is all coming from a picture taken of a hill from a certain angle. I've seen many of these in my travels through the Rockies and western Canada, but as soon as we drove a little further on the pyrmid shape was an illusion of vantage.

So like Dave says here, it is a hill until proven otherwise. Dave does not (nor anyone esle) need to prove (i.e. give evidence) that is it not a pyramid. If it is dug out and - behold - a human-made structure is underneath, the yeah, Dave, me and whomever will have a problem. Until then, it's a hill that people 'think' is a pyramid, and this assumption is only based on the vantage of the photo. Period. Many investigators use such photography in an inappropriate way, and this may well be another prime example of it.

There is no prcedent nor follow-up culture ever having built pyramids in this region - not a single cultural suggestion. Meaning, it would be shocking to find a pyramid here. Hey. maybe there is one underneath, but until the evidence is in, it's a hill. The one's caliming it is a pyramid are the ones who need to prove its a pyramid.

End-o-mundo.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/15/2006 09:28PM by Principia.