<HTML>Bryan wrote:
>
> RB says:
>
[...]
>>I thought my sarcasm was obvious.
Well, I guess if Bauval says it was sarcasm, then it must be true, as he obviously wouldn't attempt to smokescreen an error and would have immediately and publicly corrected any error he made. That I <i>still</i> don't see sarcasm in Bauval's original pronouncement (quoted in the first msg of this thread) must be a testament to my own stupidity.
>
> I of course have a copy of Krupp's article. Here's the
> caption
[...]
You missed the bit of text <i>"...one might adopt a completely different perspective and imagine the way Orion would look from a point outside the celestial sphere."</i> to the right of the map.
> So, in answer to your original post:
>
> >>Is it too much to ask that Bauval notices things like this,
> or should we speculate that he has made Maier's Law a
> philosophy of life?
>
> He did notice, therefore your speculation is unnecessary.
Yes, Bryan, if you and RB say so....
> Can this be laid to rest now?
Yes, Bryan....</HTML>