<HTML>I have to say that I have also noticed the deafening silence at Ians banning from the very people who strongly objected and accused Sharif of censorship just a few short months ago.
It seems that it's only censorship when it suits. When Ian was the 'voice of orthodoxy' his ban was an evil, disgraceful stifling of the voice of reason etc etc, now Ian's changed his tune his ban is met with silence. Why aren't Mikey, John, Duncan et al complaining to Kat about this censorship?
My view is that it doesn't matter if we agree or disagree with the ban - the moderator of a privately funded website is in charge, they have the final say. Nothing wrong with that. I've always believed that and nothing has changed now. Will the people mentioned above go on record and confirm that banning Ian is censorship and that they strongly object?
Bryan.</HTML>
