<HTML>Joanne wrote:
>
> > I must confess that the words "You are rehashing old and
> > defunct material." brougt a little bit of a hell of a large
> > smile to my face !
>
> +++ "a little bit of a hell of a large smile to my face" -
> love it!!
Thanks:-)
> Considering that Hancock seems to spend
> > most of his time "rehashing old and defunct material" I
> > thought this was a bit rich !
>
> +++ Exactly! Apparently some old and defunct is better than
> other old and defunct....
I learnt a long time ago that if something (old) is promoted by Hancock you can be sure it's been superseded a long time ago......
> > I was also interested to note that Bauval references
> > "Archaeoastronomy" - if he's familiar with that why does he
> > maintain that the modern constellation of Leo was
> > known/recognised by the Old Kingdom AEs ?
>
> +++ He may be a better researcher than we suspect, taking the
> time to wade through it all and carefully select just what he
> wants, instead of doing a superficial job as he has been
> accused. What surprised me (a little) is that a
> self-proclaimed "thinker" should want to stifle all
> discussion on current thinking and new research in an area of
> interest to him.
Like all of his type he picks and chooses and ignores anything "inconvenient" - it goes with the job....
John</HTML>
