<HTML>John Wall wrote:
>
> Do you mean this <a
> href="[
www.grahamhancock.com]; ?
+++ yep
> I must confess that the words "You are rehashing old and
> defunct material." brougt a little bit of a hell of a large
> smile to my face !
+++ "a little bit of a hell of a large smile to my face" - love it!!
Considering that Hancock seems to spend
> most of his time "rehashing old and defunct material" I
> thought this was a bit rich !
+++ Exactly! Apparently some old and defunct is better than other old and defunct....
> I was also interested to note that Bauval references
> "Archaeoastronomy" - if he's familiar with that why does he
> maintain that the modern constellation of Leo was
> known/recognised by the Old Kingdom AEs ?
+++ He may be a better researcher than we suspect, taking the time to wade through it all and carefully select just what he wants, instead of doing a superficial job as he has been accused. What surprised me (a little) is that a self-proclaimed "thinker" should want to stifle all discussion on current thinking and new research in an area of interest to him.
Joanne</HTML>
