Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 19, 2024, 7:57 am UTC    
 In:  The Hall of Maat > Ancient History - Ancient History and Archaeology > Topic
 Goto:  Forum List  •  Create A New Profile  •  Log In
  Ancient History •  Ancient Egypt •  Laboratory •  Humanities •  Apocalypse •  Paper Lens •  Coffee Shop
  Exhibitions, Conferences, Lectures, Journals •  Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Garrett
August 01, 2001 05:02PM
<HTML>Litz wrote:

> Personally, I believe both extreme views (sides) are wrong,and that the best view is somewhere in between (sort of a mixture of plenty of hypothesizing, but strong proof
necessary before the hypothesis takes over as the dominant theory). Sorry, if any of this sounds preachy (not meant to)... just trying to best express why I believe what I do (subjectively).

Litz, this is precisely how science and archaeology actually work. It is precisely because there is not just no "stong proof" but no evidence whatsoever for what GH and RB are proposing that their ideas are rejected by people familiar with the evidence.

GF</HTML>
Reply Quote
Subject Author Posted

Proof and Posturing

Mark Fagan August 01, 2001 10:43AM

Re: Proof and Posturing

Litz August 01, 2001 11:24AM

Re: Proof and Posturing

Anthony August 01, 2001 11:36AM

Re: Proof and Posturing

javier August 01, 2001 12:08PM

Re: Proof and Posturing

Litz August 01, 2001 04:32PM

Re: Proof and Posturing

Garrett August 01, 2001 05:02PM

Re: Proof and Posturing

Litz August 01, 2001 05:24PM

Re: PS

Litz August 01, 2001 05:27PM

Re: PS

Litz August 03, 2001 09:45AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login