<HTML>Frank Doernenburg wrote:
>
> CD:
> >he mummy parts found prove that at some point in the
> pyramid's history it WAS used as a tomb. However, because
> they were intrusive rather than original
>
> Fascinating, how DISPUTED (not proven) intrusions became a
> FACT in your message... As I sayd: If THIS is the way how
> "alternative history" is produced...
>
> FD :-)
You are allowed to introduce disputed evidence as fact and I am not then?
Frank wrote:
> Well, there ARE findings. In the red pyramid a foot was
> found, which was bandages in OK style and most surely belongs
> to Snofru. In the pyramid of Djedkare many mummy parts
> including a complete set of canopes was found, parts of
> mummies were found elswhere, too. And from the 6 opening
> stories of the great pyramid in the Hitat 5 speak of mummies
> found.<p>
Chris</HTML>
