If you have ever seen the show Decoded by Brad Meltzer on the
History Channel >
They were driving down the ET Highway heading to Area 51 when this same truck with cargo came speeding out of Area 51.
If you want to see that episode there should be a repeat of the show coming up.
>
So this is a US aircraft most likely a new drone.
RLH
by
RLH
-
Coffee Shop
Rope tied to the boat rudder for steering.
RLH
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
If they used a rope to measure the fields and a rope encircled the cartouche then my vote is it was a rope.
RLH
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
Well I would not completely dismiss the pi idea, because the AE where sometimes depicted as being 3 and 1/7 cubits tall, 22 palms or 88 digits. With the cubit being divided by 7 the result is 22/7 and this could lead the AE to discover the pi ratio.
It could be that the so-called short (6 divisions) and Royal (7 divisions) cubit where the same length of about 20.62 inches / 52.37 cm. It was
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
MJ Thomas 2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> RLH Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > MJ Thomas 2 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Usefully, Clagett gives worked examples of these
> ‘problems’ (reference see above).
> If you don’t have or are
by
RLH
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
MJ Thomas 2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> On perhaps a fairly minor point, it is not clear
> (to me, at least) how a horizontal run that
> included a fraction of a palm was usually seen by
> the AEs.
> For example, was it 5 palms 1 digit or 5¼ palms?
>
I think the answer would be 5 ¼ palms and convert everything to fractions.
F
by
RLH
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
MJ Thomas 2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> For the most part I see the seked 5 1/2 not in
> terms of a modern ratio - i.e. 14/11 - but as the
> AEs saw it (according to the Rhind Mathematical
> Papyrus) i.e. 1 royal cubit rise to 5 1/2 palms
> horizontal run.
> I hypothesise that this seked was seen also as 28
> digits rise
by
RLH
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Thanks that explains the 720. Interesting site you linked to but I have some concern they maybe using satellite images and not actual ground research or something like Petrie survey data. I’m going to check more into what they are claiming.
Regards
RLH
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
Sirfiroth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> True only if one uses 22/7 as a value for pi, but
> the ancient Egyptians did not use pi, but based
> their calculations on a square divided into 720
> degrees rather than circles of 360 degrees. G1 is
> the tool by which these difference can be
> calculated.
>
> Regards
>
>
H
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
cropredy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Khazar-khum Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > How is this flow detected?
> I have began to try and explain this in the
> SERPENTS section thread.
>
> It is via hand held devices that only living
> entities can communicate with, it's called
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
Jammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Cropredy
>
> 2) All of the ramp data I've collected indicates a
> sloped, but not a curved surface... can you
> document curving ramps?
>
Hi Jammer
I will reply to part 2!
It is unlikely any wooden ramps would exist for long so finding any remains is remote.
But they did have
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
For those who missed my original reply.
Hi Jammer
Not sure if anyone has seen this! Some may find it interesting?
I will add to this the idea of a curved wooden ramp. I believe this could reduce friction and would make the transition from one level to the next easier, but I have not tested it.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Regards
RLH
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
Hi Jammer
Not sure if anyone has seen this by Frank Steiger! Some may find it interesting?
I will add to this the idea of a curved wooden ramp. I believe this could reduce friction and would make the transition from one level to the next easier, but I have not tested it.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Regards
RLH
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
I admit I haven’t followed all this conversation but has anyone seen this?
Regards
RLH
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
Robert Bauval Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Robots have previously explored and sent back
> pictures from these 8-inch-square shafts,
> indicating that both shafts are blocked by a stone
> door. These stones are approximately equidistant
> (63.6 meters) from the Queen’ s Chamber.
>
Ok I see he is not using an actual measurem
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
Pistol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> does that include the horizontal length? 116.2
> royal cubits or 2396"...200 ft from chamber?
Yes Gantenbrink cad drawing starts at the wall of Queen chamber so 59.5 meters is the total length.
You could exclude the horizontal part making it 59.5 – 1.95 = 57.55 meters = 2265.74803 Inches.
Navigat
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
24 digits?
Well this could explain the Egyptian 24 digit cubit.
Now where are the people with 28 digits?
RLH
by
RLH
-
Coffee Shop
Hi Robert
I don’t think the math adds up!
Gantenbrink cad drawing has 59.5 meters to door.
59.5 meters = 2342.52 inches
2342.52 / 121 = 19.359669 inches.
Long cubit 28 digits = about 20.62 inches.
Short cubit 24 digits = about 17.674286 inches.
So not a good match.
Another way.
2342.52 / 20.62 = 113.6 long cubits.
2342.52 / 17.674286 = 132.54 short cubits.
Another way
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
Katherine Reece Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> RLH Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Thank you for making my point! Why quarry out
> a
> > big pit of about 300 feet when they could
> have
> > avoided the fault line and made a smaller
> body of
> > about 200 feet. To
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
Roxana Cooper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Since when are the AEs that picky about
> proportions?
Wow! You do realize the AE invented a system that is still used by artists today.
May I recommend researching “The Egyptian Canon of Proportions”.
Then compare this 4th dynasty sphinx
to the Giza Sphinx.
If anything that Sphinx of Hetepher
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
None of this face matching business has any meaning as to the age of the Sphinx if the head was re carved?
No one IMO has really came up with a solid explanation as to why the Giza Sphinx head is so small compared to the body (see side view).
IMO a good artist would just make the body smaller if there was not enough material to make the head larger. It stands to reason the head was created
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
If you can find a grizzly with a sense of humor you may try planking.
Planking > [5secondfilms.com]
While the grizzly is doubled over laughing you quietly sneak away.
RLH
by
RLH
-
Coffee Shop
Yes tiny bells and a pepper spray might not be a good idea.
You could take a kitty cat to help defend against bears.
Youtube >
RLH
by
RLH
-
Coffee Shop
There is that old joke.
You don’t need to out run the bear, just out run the people you’re with.
RLH
by
RLH
-
Coffee Shop
There is a technique where a mason drags red chalk across a stone to find the high points, then chisels off the high points.
That could be the case here.
RLH
by
RLH
-
Ancient Egypt
Don Barone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi all ...
>
> As much as you would probably like to see this in
> The Alternative Geometry Section I think I can
> prove quite scientifically where it came from and
> if I am right ALL OF Astronomer Royal of Scotland
> Charles Piazzi Smyth's (1819–1900) work will be
> vindicated !
by
RLH
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Don Barone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> But now a new proposal for what is meant by the
> crescent Moon and Sun disc.
>
> It is now my conviction that what the crescent
> moon is signifying is ONE DAY OF THE MOON'S CYCLE
> !
>
> and now combining that and the actual diameter of
> The Moon we get this:
>
by
RLH
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
The world needs ditch diggers too!
RLH
by
RLH
-
Laboratory
Ogygos wrote
> Sorry, RLH is correct here is the math: <
Thanks O!
Here is another one you and Don may find interesting or maybe not?
Line from grid point A through grid points B and extended to point C defines the radius of circle D.
So radius circle D = .4472 plus 1 = 1.4472 and that is the height of your rectangle.
Regards
RLH
by
RLH
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology
Hi Don
I just thought I should point out a mistake you have here.
In your 4th picture down you have ( DC = CB = OF = OB = EF = 1 ) all listed as equal to one.
But this can not be true.
OF and OB and EF are equal to one but DC and CB are not. Hope that does not effect any results you may have concluded.
Regards
RLH
by
RLH
-
Alternative Geometry and Numerology