Spiros Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>

Quote

The Bent Pyramid pre-dates any mention of
> the New Jerusalem (Ezekiel) by some 2,000 years.
>

> It all comes down to context. Why does the Bent
> pyramid complex point to Jerusalem?

The first evidence of city fortifications for Jerusalem might date to around the 18th century BCE, post-dating the Bent Pyramid by some 800 years.

So how could the BP be pointing at something 270 miles away (as the crow flies) that didn't yet exist?

> Time is not
> important since we cannot be sure that the pyramid
> was not designed by time-travelers.

(Oh ... I might have known ... )

Be that as it may: there is no reliable evidence to support the concept of time-travel.

Consequently, it is safe to dismiss time-travel as an explanation.

So we're back to the question: how could the BP be pointing at a city 270 miles away (as the crow flies) that didn't yet exist?

Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at

Rules and Guidelines

hallofmaatforum@proton.me