Well then it appears Newton was in error ... Just curious why you would point out and use erroneous data and when you state: "In conclusion, Newton's temple cubit leads to a conundrum, and the answer to riddle requires a proper overview of history. ... " I fail to see a conundrum as Newton's numbers were wrong. He claimed 24.83 but it is 24.7845 ... What am I missing in your post ?

Regards
Don

"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db