Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 1:10 pm UTC    
December 10, 2010 03:09PM
Don, surely you realize the RATIOS (not the absolute measurements) would stay consistent regardless of the size?

Whether this was a 10 meter, 500 meter, or 5,000 meter per side base, the ratios would be the same.

"1.6... 2.75... 26 degrees" all of these so called "amazing and mystifying" non-coincidences are pre-ordained by the nature of the initial shape!
Furthermore none of it proves one iota of intent.

This type of promotional post reminds me not a little of the Carnival Barker,
promising amazing and mystifying sights,
if people only pay two bits to see them...

Jammer
Subject Author Posted

The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

Don Barone December 09, 2010 02:33PM

Re: The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

Don Barone December 09, 2010 03:08PM

Re: The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

sansahansan December 09, 2010 03:32PM

Re: The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

Don Barone December 09, 2010 04:04PM

Re: The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

Don Barone December 09, 2010 04:20PM

Re: The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

Don Barone December 10, 2010 12:08AM

Re: The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

Don Barone December 10, 2010 08:15AM

Re: The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

Don Barone December 10, 2010 10:28AM

Re: The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

Don Barone December 10, 2010 11:58AM

Re: The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

Don Barone December 10, 2010 01:32PM

Re: The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

Jammer December 10, 2010 03:09PM

Re: The geometry at Giza continues to astound.

Don Barone December 10, 2010 03:16PM

**Moderation note**

Hermione December 12, 2010 08:44AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.