Jammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Excuse me, but in the standard rules of debate on
> this subject wouldn't you first need to prove
> there is a Creator, than find data to prove his
> design intent?

Standard Intelligent Design drivel. It's been debunked for years now.

Yawn.



>
> And isn't using the ratio to prove the creator,
> their intent, and the ratio itself a textbook
> circular argument?

Technically, isn't any debate about encoded Pi a circular argument?



Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.