I'll keep looking for it on Google

And here is what I actually wrote:

.... So it would appear to be somewhere between 104 and 105 meters.

Angle is supposed to 43.3667 degrees so this should give us for a height 198.3558 cubits

However on a wide variety of sites the angle is given as 43 degrees even, so which is correct ? At this point I am not sure. Again the original field notes would be helpful.

198.5 cubits would be = 103.954 meters BUT THEN ONLY EQUALS 341.05 FEET not the 343 feet that is claimed and gives a slope angle of 43.387 or 43° 23.2' Extremely close to what is given on some sites.

199 cubits would give us 104.216 and gives a slope angle of 43.459 or 43° 27.6'

200 cubits would give us 104.74 and gives a slope angle of 43.603 or 43° 36.2'

And again peculiar that again metric seems to meet cubit when we see that the length of the sides for The Red Pyramid in meters mirrors 1/2 the base of The Great Pyramid in cubits.

Using the 343 feet that is reported on most sites we get 343 x 12 / 20.618034 = 199.63 cubits and very close to what I think the height is and was meant to be of exactly 200 cubits. ...

db

"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db