Don Barone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And did you know that if you add the diameters of
> all the planets together you get 1/10 th the
> circumference of The Earth in kilometers ?
First, it is
10 times not 1/10th.
> and just curious again how the world of astronomy
> views the fact that The Great Pyramid (440 cubits)
> is EXACTLY in relationship to the overall height
> of The Giza Plateau (from south side of G3 to
> north side of G1 or about 1732.05 cubits) in the
> EXACT SAME PROPORTION as Mercury's distance from
> The Sun is to Mars distance from The Sun - namely
> 1:3.93648 or 3.93648 to 1.
Probably the same way they view the fact that 1 mile(5280 feet) divided by 12(inches in a foot)= 440.
Not too impressed.
> and an answer ...
>
> Jonny:
>
> ... As I said, no theory other than orbital
> resonances to explain their relative positioning.
> there are some ideas obviously that Jupiter
> prevented a planet forming between Mars and itself
> etc. there are also ideas of why planets in
> certain positions have particular compositions
> etc.
But no ab initio theory or model where they
> can predict where planets will form from first
> principles. ...
For those who noticed the
As I said in the above...
Quote
Okay Jonny but what is the prevailing theory of why the planets are the distance they are form The Sun
No theory, only what I said, they formed in either in those regions, or they developed orbital resonances which altered their placements. There is no grand unified theory as to why they formed where they did, and no astronomer today puts any faith in the titus-bode law as being a fundamental law of physics, since although it appears to explain the positions of the planets, it does not explain mass, size and composition. If anything, it is believed that Titus-Bode law comes from the orbital resonances. The Titus Bode law is usually only mentioned in passing in a historical context, and is not taught as any fundamental principle or truth.
I havent looked at your stuff in any great detail to form an opinion, hence why i didnt give it. And unfortunately, nor do I have time at the moment to look at it.
Jonny
I have underlined the above to point out a flaw in the "great design" story here.
Your number crunching is nothing more then your simplistic version of the Titus-Bode law. You are number crunching to make the chosen numbers match and then want everyone to accept those values as proof of something.
Like the above underlined, your latest drawings/designs might get a more accurate matching overlay but it fails at the same places the Titus-Bode law did.
Quote
since although it appears to explain the positions of the planets, it does not explain mass, size and composition. If anything, it is believed that Titus-Bode law comes from the orbital resonances.
Quote
...is not taught as any fundamental principle or truth
> So if there are no other theories out there
> ANYWHERE how the hell can I be judged wrong? On
> what basis ? This is Ma'at? Velikovsky move over I
> coming to join you.
Ignorance of physics is no excuse for blind-faith beliefs!
Lobo-hotei
lobo
Treat the earth well, It was not given to you by your parents, It was loaned to you by your children.
Native American Proverb