> I think you may have Uranus and Neptune reversed.
> It's impossible for a human to see
> Neptune...insufficient reflective light...well
> below the sensitivity of the human eye.
Yes I know but might not have solely relied on the human eye:



> Similar to the AE...I believe (no proof) that
> there is a "cross-over" or mixture of stars and
> planets. You must remember, planets were wandering
> stars...they were all bundled together and it was
> certainly realized that several were always
> moving.
You have to keep in mind that there is a great deal of advanced info encoded in many places at ancient times. This can not be explained without the help of ET influence. Just take the simplest of all things. Write down in ancient Greek the phrase for "planet Earth". In pre-Eucledian non Ionic alphabets the long E "H" was written with an E - see beta instead of bhta. Thus we have:

PLANETES GE (planet Earth) = (80 + 30 + 1 + 50 + 5 + 300 + 5 + 200) + (3 + 5) = 679

Earth diameter x a^2 = 678.53 meters

(678.53 meters)/6^4 = (678.53 meters)/1296 = 0.523557 meters = 20.6125 inches = 1 royal cubit (exactly)

METRON ARISTON (excellent measure) = 1296

> You are reaching again:
How am I reaching? The distance between Kafre's pyramid and Menkaure's pyramid is a decadic sub-multiple of the distance between Neptune and the Sun. The distance between Kafre's pyramid and Khufu's pyramid is a decadic sub-multiple of the diameter of Neptune. The semi-perimeter of Kafre's pyramid is a decadic sub-multiple of the distance between Neptune and the Earth. If someone at Egypt knew this info at 2500 BC, who is to say that someone - maybe the same "person" also knew it at 3000 BC? Remember these same dimensions - in a smaller scale - show up on the external dimensions of the dove and geometric disks. And then there is the numbers etc.

> Who "based" these religions on these two planets?
Moses was in a position to have access to this info. On the other hand some consider that Jesus went to Egypt before speaking to his disciples. In Hellas there was a Zeus(Jupiter) - Poseidon(Neptune) rivalry where we can consider that Zeus won. The religious beliefs I mentioned seem to come from Egypt - probably from the Horus notion.

> if ET's designed
> this disc then it would have been perfect in
> shape, size and design.
They did not design it for them selves - no need for that. They designed it accordingly for an Egyptian(earthling). And for this - it's shape size and design is perfect - see deviations which can be explained(my other post on Earth obliquity).

> Giza carries similar mathematical relationships
> and techniques, but that is insufficient to tie
> both disc and pyramids together.

See above for a correlation with Giza. But we surely need more. Maybe the placement of his tomb at Saqqara in regards to Abydos can help in this regard...

> years ago...there's nothing difficult about
> it...but modern physics? I question.

In my first book that I have finished I define a cosmological constant that links the microcosm - and modern physics with the macrocosm and astronomy. It is derived from ancient sources and I even provide the name of it in different cultures. It involves a familiar number found on the geometric disk. Thus the other numbers should get us thinking. Is there more? There seems to be, but I have not figured it all out yet.