Don Barone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rich: I usually like your work. Not this time.
>
> Don: I consider it the best work I have ever
> done.

> It is a generic term meant to
> imply the probability of intelligent design in the
> make up of The Solar System and also in The
> Universe but I will not address those points on
> this forum. I only wish to clarify the title of
> the pages I present so as to not mislead.
>
> Best
> Don Barone
-- ok. I see what you mean. If this post has meaning, it points to intelligent design. And as such, it is tremendously important. I see what you mean by best/most important.

On the other hand, the evidence presented, while interesting, has not yet reached the level required to convince many readers onto the relevancy of such a post.
****

Now, many of your topics have interested me in the past... you helped me with a second sphinx one.... on that one, one of the self-doubts that I have raised recently is that if one sphinx has a causeway... why would a second spinx not have a causeway as well. So that one was more interesting to me than to others, probably.
****

Another brilliant topic of yours was this one:

The Slope Angles of ALL The Pyramids Re-visited
[www.hallofmaat.com]

Now this one doesn't just affect me. This one effects all gizamids. This one effects all pyramid researchers of the future. It was a brilliant study with potentially far-reaching consequences. And some neat observations that can not be disqualified.

I mean if I got to choose a study on Maat to be continued, to be finished, any study from any member... this one is in the top 5, for sure. It is one of the best numerology/pyramid studies I have ever seen. Perhaps there is deeper meaning to some of your other research... but I'd really like to see this one followed up on too.