Hi Clive

Clive Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Petrie measured to precision but "assumed"
> incorrectly with his calculations.
> I want you to clearly understand that none of the
> three were actually built on the ratios calculated
> from the base casings...they were intentionally
> cut at these angles to provide two sets of values
> for each structure.

Is this not an assumption on your part or is there proof you can offer to substantiate your claim?

> As for G3...your 5/4 ratio of 51.34 degrees is the
> "actual" slope of G1 as viewed today, but it is
> not applicable to G3. Stay with the 1.24:1 ratio
> given...believe me...there's a reason.
>
>
> Best.
> Clive
>
Petrie's incorrect assumption is? I am also curious about the reason for (1 6/25:1 ratio?
G1, G3, Dashur North and the Bent Pyramids mesh like fine gears mesh based on Petrie's measures.

Regards,
Jacob