Khazar-khum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Let's see...outside of the fact that it's not to scale?
Khazar:
Study drafting.
Not to scale means that an actual "length reference" is not given...my option.
> Someone traps you and you deny saying what you said in a post further up the chain.
Please expand...!
> But I digress.
Why?
You make a statement without supportive evidence then digress...!!!!
> You have a non-scale drawing based on surveys made of the site.
It is not based from surveys...it is pulled off Google Earth...a computer program that includes an image of the site with latitude and longitude positioning to inches of accuracy.
> That's not the issue. The issue is the points you choose for your geometric drawings,
> those drawings themselves, and the non-conclusions you're reaching.
Khazar:
Nothing is conclusive and I'm not stating that it is...but the geometry is accurate and that cannot be denied.
Attempting to make connections between these walls is better than ignoring them completely or applying assumptive stories that cannot be supported.
Best.
Clive