Jiri Mruzek Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> QUOTE
> Well, Jiri, I can only tell you that you couldn't
> be more wrong if you tried.
> I have spent many years studying the subject
> matter in depth - and in its proper context.
> I am not dismissing your theory out of hand.
> The results of my own 30+ years research lead me
> to assert that your findings are nonsensical and
> have nothing to do with the culture that created
> the Giza necropolis.
> Unquote
>
> You assert on the basis of a limited experience of
> that culture.

My disagreeing with your theory does not necessarily mean that I have limited knowledge of the subject matter.


You are not privy to Imhotep's
> knowledge, much like common folks of those times.

Is anybody today (other than you?) privy to the extent of Imhotep’s knowledge (I presume you mean particularly in the field of mathematics)?


> I analyze data strictly limited to the planned
> layout of the big Giza pyramids.

And therein is your theory’s weakness, Jiri.
You need to take into consideration all of the AE structures on the Plateau (not just the three giant pyramids there), and all in the context of the culture that created them.


>You have zilch
> experience in that, as you admit,

I have? I do? Hmm, news to me.


> and thus have no
> idea what it takes to produce microscopically
> accurate order in something chaotic.

Please, please tell me you are not taking actual measurements beyond 1/16 of a digit (0.05” or 1mm) …


> Well, let me
> tell you - It takes forever.

Forever is a long time, so when did you start working on your theory?


> Finding it at Giza
> obviously means that it was in the plan.

Oh dear, another occasion when I feel I can sum up your theory with a single word: nonsense.


> > The method is actually very simple, as simple
> as can be to not be also obvious.
>
> QUOTE
> Why didn't the designer want it to be obvious?
> What was the point of the exercise, Jiri?
> Unquote
>
> Why don't they print crossword puzzles with the
> solutions?

Are you saying that the designer of the plan you have, um, uncovered was setting a puzzle for later generations to solve?
If so, then I can only wonder if it ever crossed his mind that four-and-a-half thousand years would pass before somebody capable of solving the riddle would happen along.


> Also, how about the fact that the design process
> of the Giza layout is dynamic.

How about, indeed!
Er, what do you mean here by dynamic?


>It is not as
> simplistic as you would like it to be.

Hang on, earlier you said your theory was very simple.
Perhaps I am not understanding you here.


> The design
> becomes obvious once you answer the questions it
> poses during analysis.

Hmm, I’m definitely not understanding you here


> The point of it has
> something to do with the brain, I believe.

Would that be a 21st Century AD brain or a 4th Dyn Egyptian one?

MJ