What I had written to you, Don, exactly was:

Quote

"And for the record, I found the "Speed of Light" encoding at Giza almost ten years ago. It was garbage then. It is garbage now."

Notice I did not specify that I found the SAME "Speed of Light" encoding at Giza. I found it "encoded" there. I have mentioned it repeatedly here on the website. The most recent public disclosure of same was October 27, 2007, when I said this:

Quote

Did you know the perimeter of Khufu's pyramid has something to do with being a multiple of the speed of light? Something like one-one-millionth of something. I found that out while playing with the numbers. There's a good example of something I "discovered", but almost immediately discarded. I crammed all those numbers just about any which way I could into my calculator, or a spreadsheet program... and what I came to discover was that it was all a complete waste of time until I knew what the pyramid builders had to say about their pyramids.

And that is why I discuss things the way I do. Start with the culture. Everything else is just a monumental waste of time. (Pun intended).

Here's the link: [www.hallofmaat.com]

I'm actually pretty sure I've mentioned it directly to you before as well. I know I made a passing comment about it here: [www.hallofmaat.com]

And I mentioned it here:

Quote

People have found ways of manipulating the pyramid dimensions to show that the AEs had knowledge of:

Pi
Phi
C (Speed of light)
Planetary dimensions (ours and others)
Timelines of Creationism
etc.

None of these have any more evidence, either physically or contextually, than the first one: Pyramid Pi.

Link: [www.hallofmaat.com]

Of course, there's THIS little ditty from January of 2006:

Quote

What right does anybody logically have to ignore that complete dearth of evidence and just blindly assert that "they MUST have!" and then start a giant Quest for the Holy Coincidednce? No right, of course. Oh, I think it's a fun challenge, and I've been able to find the speed of light "encoded" in Khufu's pyramid, and I've found Pi in my bathroom at work. Playing with numbers is a good mental exercise, but without evidenciary precedent, it is a meaningless activity.

From here: [www.hallofmaat.com]


Clearly I can go on with the searches all evening. I have been discussing it here for years, Don. You were an active participant in that last thread, by the way. Do you ever read what people write about the real culture of ancient Egypt as posted here at Ma'at? I know you had some serious errors of fact, very basic facts, in the letter you asked me to review. I have to wonder if you've ever taken the time to read even a children's book on the subject after the mistakes you put forth as facts and evidence in your email to me.

No matter. I'm through with all this. It's been a monumental waste of my time, done as a favor to you, and repaid by you with outrageous claims and threats to publish my private emails. I just hope this serves as a warning to anyone else with whom you might privately communicate under the guise of guaranteed confidentiality.

The fact of the matter is, and will always remain, that you have manipulated the dimensions of the plateau and the pyramids therein to render a relationship, guaranteed to be true, to whatever geometrical anomaly you happen to be investigating at that time of your life. Remember how you sought and found the perfect pentagram? How about the special wood pentagram from Rennes le Chateau? How about planetary dimensions? How about all that stuff to do with the silly Renaissance paintings of the shepherds? You wanted to find a relationship, and because there are SO many dimensions at Giza with which you can play, you were able to find them.

None of them were intentionally put there by the builders.

All of them were coincidences.

Period.

You've never changed your flawed methodology, and I'm very sad to say I now think you never will.

Good bye, Don. Don't ask me for any more favors.

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.