Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 19, 2024, 8:01 am UTC    
September 02, 2020 08:54AM
Hans Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> No I didn't I was referring to what was then known
> about the ancient Egyptian culture and religion as
> noted by ancient Greek and Roman writers.

Nothing about the ancient hieroglyphs or their writers were known in antiquity. Nothing was known by Champollion or Young about the ancient glyphs which weren't found until 1882.

> There is no evidence to conclude that the culture
> of Egypt did completely change between the time
> the PT were written and the Rosetta Stone.

So?

> No evidence exist that shows the hieroglyphs of
> the great pyramid builder have not been solved
> correctly.

Of course it exists and it was in the very post you neglected to read and then ignored in your comments.

> As pointed out to numerous times they had
> abstractions, and that the entire AE language IS
> NOT included in the limited vocabulary of the PT.
> You are just making the same tired, boring
> unsupported claims you've made for 15 years and
> endlessly repeated - without evidence.

You maintain "neter" means "an imaginary consciousness that controls mans' destiny and I maintain it is mistranslated and means "natural phenomena". You'll have to do better to identify a real abstraction. Even if you ever find one you'll need to explain how most of our words have a the quality of being an abstraction and this does not apply to the glyphs which break Zipf's Law and Heap's Law and contains too few words to communicate even simple ideas. You'll need to explain why all the writing is "religious" and "magical".

You'll now ignore each of these simple points as you have several times before and accuse me of being repetitious,. Why not reply on-topic? You'll ignore this last question too so I'll answer it. You're off-topic because you can't win. Modern beliefs are based on assumptions laid down by Champollion which put us on a very long detour. His assumption just happened to work because the language was reflective of the known culture of the "book of the dead" but they did not work for the PT and Young could have solved it mathematically.

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
Subject Author Posted

Thomas Young's notes on deciphering AE hieroglyphs

Hermione August 31, 2020 03:49AM

Re: Thomas Young's notes on deciphering AE hieroglyphs

cladking September 01, 2020 07:57AM

Re: Thomas Young's notes on deciphering AE hieroglyphs

Hans September 01, 2020 01:07PM

Re: Thomas Young's notes on deciphering AE hieroglyphs

cladking September 01, 2020 02:02PM

Re: Thomas Young's notes on deciphering AE hieroglyphs

Hans September 01, 2020 05:00PM

Re: Thomas Young's notes on deciphering AE hieroglyphs

cladking September 02, 2020 08:54AM

Re: Thomas Young's notes on deciphering AE hieroglyphs

Hans September 02, 2020 10:35AM

Re: Thomas Young's notes on deciphering AE hieroglyphs

cladking September 02, 2020 11:17AM

Re: Thomas Young's notes on deciphering AE hieroglyphs

Hans September 02, 2020 03:11PM

**Sub-thread closed**

Hermione September 03, 2020 02:28AM

Re: Thomas Young's notes on deciphering AE hieroglyphs

John B September 11, 2020 05:40PM

**Sub-thread closed**

Hermione September 12, 2020 03:44AM

Re: Thomas Young's notes on deciphering AE hieroglyphs

Hermione September 01, 2020 03:24PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login