[academia.edu]

It isn’t very often that a theory comes along that one single piece of evidence, one tiny little detail, can destroy the entire thesis.

But here is one of them.

In a nutshell, the author asserts that the pyramids were built centuries earlier over many generations for purposes unknown. This single sentence sums up what the author wishes were true, so that he could proceed with his baseless speculations:

“The Great Pyramid itself did not contain any cartouche of Khufu.” (P.12)

In order for Onvlee’s speculation to work (It really isn’t fair to even call it a theory, because it actually omits ample data we have in our possession), there must be no inscriptions inside Khufu’s pyramid at Giza. The simple existence of the cartouche in the Relieving Chambers remove all doubt that the pyramid was built in the Fourth Dynasty according to the proper chronology that has developed over the last 2000 years. This armchair researcher adds nothing to the conversation except a discussion of a few pyramids and the obvious acknowledgement that they are made of limestone.

Oh wait. He actually brings up Davidovits, so he won’t even acknowledge that.

I give this theory 3.5 Stargates out of 5.

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.