Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 28, 2024, 3:12 am UTC    
September 19, 2016 07:01PM
I am convinced that the Great Pyramid's intended height and half-length of a side at the base were derived quite simply from the seked 5 1/2 as follows.

The intended height of the Pyramid is in royal cubits ten times the number of digits (28) in the rise of seked 5 1/2. 28rc x 10 = 280rc.

Half the intended length of a side at the base is in royal cubits ten times the number of digits (22) in the run of seked 5 1/2. 22rc x 10 = 220rc.

Length of a side at the base = 220rc x 2 = 440rc
Perimeter of the base = 440rc x 4 = 1760rc

Why seked 5 1/2?
Perhaps because it naturally incorporates pi as 3 1/7.


Robin (MJT)



We can't all be right, but we could all be wrong ...
Subject Author Posted

the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

robin cook August 20, 2016 10:42AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Khazar-khum August 20, 2016 12:05PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Mark Heaton August 20, 2016 01:49PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Rick Baudé August 20, 2016 03:49PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Mark Heaton August 21, 2016 07:58AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Khazar-khum August 21, 2016 04:06PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Dr Dave Lightbody August 22, 2016 10:37AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Khazar-khum August 22, 2016 11:07AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Mark Heaton August 22, 2016 11:47AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Dr Dave Lightbody August 22, 2016 12:54PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Byrd August 23, 2016 02:19AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Dr Dave Lightbody August 23, 2016 10:21AM

the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Jammer August 23, 2016 11:19AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Rick Baudé August 23, 2016 12:39PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

robin cook August 24, 2016 09:13AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Byrd August 22, 2016 12:31AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Mark Heaton August 22, 2016 11:39AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Rick Baudé August 22, 2016 02:54PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Mark Heaton August 22, 2016 05:51PM

the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Jammer August 23, 2016 11:12AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Mark Heaton August 23, 2016 11:51AM

the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Jammer August 23, 2016 12:28PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Mark Heaton August 23, 2016 02:15PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

L Cooper August 24, 2016 06:43AM

Cubit variability

Hermione August 24, 2016 09:49AM

Re: Cubit variability

L Cooper August 24, 2016 11:32AM

Re: Cubit variability

Hermione August 24, 2016 04:09PM

Re: Cubit variability

L Cooper August 25, 2016 07:32AM

Re: Cubit variability

Spiros August 26, 2016 03:39AM

Re: Cubit variability

Hermione August 26, 2016 04:18AM

Re: Cubit variability

Pistol September 13, 2016 06:33AM

Cubit variability

Jammer September 13, 2016 12:32PM

Re: Cubit variability

Pistol September 13, 2016 02:58PM

Re: Cubit variability

Spiros September 20, 2016 06:22AM

Re: Cubit variability

Geotio September 20, 2016 07:31AM

Re: Cubit variability

Pistol September 12, 2016 06:42PM

Re: Cubit variability

Mark Heaton September 13, 2016 07:47AM

Re: Cubit variability

L Cooper September 13, 2016 09:19AM

Re: Cubit variability

Mark Heaton September 13, 2016 12:51PM

Re: Cubit variability

jacob boaz September 17, 2016 01:13PM

Re: The apparent connection to feet and inches

Mark Heaton September 18, 2016 01:36PM

Re: Cubit variability

Pistol September 18, 2016 01:54PM

Re: Cubit variability

jacob boaz September 18, 2016 10:23PM

Re: Cubit variability

Pistol September 19, 2016 12:52PM

Re: Cubit variability

Mark Heaton September 19, 2016 01:29PM

Re: Cubit variability

Pistol September 19, 2016 02:12PM

A rational design in line with Petrie

Mark Heaton September 19, 2016 03:12PM

Re: A rational design in line with Petrie

Pistol September 19, 2016 04:38PM

Re: A rational design in line with Petrie

M J Thomas September 19, 2016 07:01PM

Re: A rational design in line with Petrie

Mark Heaton September 20, 2016 02:41AM

Re: The apparent connection to feet and inches

jacob boaz September 18, 2016 08:23PM

Re: The true connection to Egyptian digits

Mark Heaton September 19, 2016 01:28PM

Re: The true connection to Egyptian digits

jacob boaz September 20, 2016 08:19PM

Re: Cubit variability

Spiros September 13, 2016 10:42PM

Re: Cubit variability

Hermione September 14, 2016 01:54AM

Re: Cubit variability

Pistol September 14, 2016 02:03AM

Re: Cubit variability

Hans September 16, 2016 09:10PM

Re: Cubit variability

jacob boaz September 17, 2016 12:35PM

Re: Cubit variability

Hans September 17, 2016 01:51PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Dr Dave Lightbody August 25, 2016 01:41PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

L Cooper August 25, 2016 04:29PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Hermione August 26, 2016 04:09AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

L Cooper August 26, 2016 09:57AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

GChase August 28, 2016 03:10AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Mark Heaton August 28, 2016 10:54AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

GChase August 28, 2016 02:41PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

GChase August 30, 2016 05:03PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

Spiros September 04, 2016 10:15AM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

robin cook September 04, 2016 02:20PM

Re: the Giza layout, design or serendipity?

L Cooper September 04, 2016 03:59PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login