northstar2595 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh forget it. Wiki is unworthy of actual GP facts.
> That's why it's wikipedia and not an actual source
> of reliable information.
Unless, of course, you choose to cite it. Then it's irrefutable.
Why waste my time on
> them? Not even slightly worth the effort. Besides,
> I rather like the fact that the truth is only
> known to a select few, which doesn't. of course,
> include Warwick or Anthony, two people whose only
> contribution to the subject is the phrase "no it
> isn't". Takes a lot of brain power to say that,
> repeatedly, ad infinitum.
Yeah, why waste your time teaching people what you say you've learned. You know it, so who else needs to? It's not like you'll ever make an attempt to publish it anyway; you'd sooner take your insights to the grave, right?
After all, anyone who disagrees with you or has evidence contrary to yours can't possibly know the truth, and therefore aren't worth listening to. You're beyond that. You're post-academic. Those bozos who spend all their time figuring out the culture that made the pyramids have nothing on you. They're hidebound naysayers who don't deserve to know the truth. Right?
BTW, I didn't pull it off Wikipedia either.