Dave L Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Chris Tedder who used to post here, and still does
> sometimes I think, is probably the person with the
> most in depth understanding of the shafts,
> certainly more than John Wall for sure, and as I
> understand it he accepts that the shafts were
> orientated to certain parts of the night sky that
> were the domain of certain stars with specific
> meanings and purposes.
>
> I have additional information that will be
> available later in the year that shows that Sirius
> was certainly associate with the southern KC star
> shaft.

Despite all the chaff, Tedder's reasoning for final alignment of KC shafts c.2570 BC is persuasive and would be greatly strengthened if the 'final part' of QC south gives the same date (what is the angle of this part and what star might align with it at what date?). If the upper pair had to conform to geometry then the lower pair should as well (which geometry is favoured?). So what is the situation wrt the QC shafts?
(Why do you think Sirius was associated with KC south? Surely QC south nearer to Sirius?)

poundr17