Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 11, 2024, 9:43 pm UTC    
January 15, 2008 08:23AM
Nothing really surprising in this presentation. In our previous dialogue, I've said Barsoum already discredited Davidovits science. And so does this one. Kaolin Clay is not the glue. Also, without using Aluminum-based glues like Kaolin Clay, we can definitively rule out geopolymers.

So either the rock is natural (99% chance), or a different formula is needed (1% chance). (These numbers are illustrative, they don't matter). The burden of proof is always with the theorist, so there is no need to waste our time crossing off all other possibilities. However, not having looked at asbestos-based cements, I personally have this this nagging reservation not to cross those off the list of possibilities.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/15/2008 08:28AM by rich.
Subject Author Posted

Dr. Jana's slideshow rebuttal to recent geopolymer claims

Archae Solenhofen January 15, 2008 01:00AM

Re: Dr. Jana's slideshow rebuttal to recent geopolymer claims

rich January 15, 2008 08:23AM

Re: Dr. Jana's slideshow rebuttal to recent geopolymer claims

Archae Solenhofen January 15, 2008 04:48PM

Re: Dr. Jana's slideshow rebuttal to recent geopolymer claims

rich January 15, 2008 10:23PM

Re: Dr. Jana's slideshow rebuttal to recent geopolymer claims

Archae Solenhofen January 16, 2008 04:23AM

Re: Dr. Jana's slideshow rebuttal to recent geopolymer claims

rich January 16, 2008 11:31AM

Re: Dr. Jana's slideshow rebuttal to recent geopolymer claims

Archae Solenhofen January 16, 2008 12:43PM

Re: Dr. Jana's slideshow rebuttal to recent geopolymer claims

cladking January 16, 2008 05:44PM

Re: Dr. Jana's slideshow rebuttal to recent geopolymer claims

Archae Solenhofen January 16, 2008 10:27PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login