If you read the paper a long time ago it must mean you agree with it, because I don't see your rebuttal to it in Antiquity.

RB: "Did you ever find that paper on the upright tusk? No?" It's still right were I said it was, it hasn't went anywhere. It's still in the references of a paper I referenced. Which means neither you or the Cerutti team are reading references.

RB: "I've moved on from Cerutti."
A wise move IMO, wasn't much there to begin with...

[archeothoughts.wordpress.com]
and
[www.cambridge.org]

[arstechnica.com]
"But Baylor University anthropologist Joseph Ferraro and his colleagues argue that natural processes could also have been to blame. They say they’ve seen the same kinds of spiral fractures, impact notches, and flake scars on bones at other sites—like a group of 24,000-year-old mammoth bones at Inglewood Mammoth Site in Maryland, a group of 66,800-to-51,300-year-old mammoth bones at Waco Mammoth National Monument in Texas, and others dating all the way back to the Triassic Period."

Spiral fractures,Triassic? Man as Old as Coal?
[www.dinosaurc14ages.com]