Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 18, 2024, 7:48 am UTC    
October 12, 2005 07:51PM
When did you ever claim that matter is defined by the observers motion relative to universal geometry ? Or ever anything remotely similar ? And don't come out with some general copenhagen interpretation mixed with some general misconceptions about EM radiation. This is a very specific point and your "Exactly smiling smiley" is typical of your approach. You don't care about whats true - you just say the first thing that comes into your head. Thats not a problem if you're chilling out and listening to music etc. But it is a problem when you play games with people like Bernard and Paul and Tommi who make a real effort to try and help you understand why the "othodox" position is the way it is and why, and you throw it back at them like my 4 year old nephew sometimes does (rarely in comparison).



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/13/2005 12:44AM by lobo-hotei.
Subject Author Posted

Rindler particles

Simon October 12, 2005 08:36AM

Re: Rindler particles

wirelessguru1 October 12, 2005 12:45PM

Re: Rindler particles

Simon October 12, 2005 02:40PM

Re: Rindler particles

wirelessguru1 October 12, 2005 07:10PM

Re: Rindler particles

Simon October 12, 2005 07:51PM

Re: Rindler particles

wirelessguru1 October 12, 2005 10:07PM

mod note

lobo-hotei October 13, 2005 12:47AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login