Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 19, 2024, 2:44 am UTC    
September 22, 2005 04:28PM
[news.bbc.co.uk]

Actually, i'm not convinced that it is. More like a rehash of what we already know for the public and documentary buffs, if not simply fuel for debate. To be honest with you, i think this one's going to take a long time to settle.

And about the biological laws, i know i'm not the expert on this and don't yet know the position you guys take on this issue, but i don't know of single scientist who has stated for certain that h. erectus was the ancestor. In fact, i know a number of cases where scientists (among the h. floresiensis camp) have said and showed otherwise.

smiling smiley



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/22/2005 04:38PM by darkuser.
Subject Author Posted

New evidence for the diseased 'Hobbit'

darkuser September 22, 2005 04:28PM

Re: New evidence for the diseased 'Hobbit'

Allan Shumaker September 22, 2005 05:40PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login