Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 19, 2024, 2:29 am UTC    
September 13, 2005 04:34PM
>>> Degenerating from what? When was society at its non-degenerated peak?
>>
>> Look, the peak will be full and complete degeneration which we have yet to
>> achieve...Maybe that peak will be 2012!
>
> So our society is degenerating from a peak we haven't reached yet?

Please do not try to apply reverse twisted logic to the problem at hand...

The peak is the transition of the age itself. That is both the culmination of both personal reality evolution and common reality degeneration for that entire prior age cycle...

In other words, we are reaching a peak in both evolution and degeneration...

> Holy Macaroni!
> (not-so-veiled reference to the FSM)
> Let's Do The Time Warp Again!

Well, you better get in with the program because a time shift or an overall re-synchronization (reality gap adjustment) will have to take place one way or another since true reality is not linear but rather cyclical...

You can call this the period of great purification where Nature itself is being re-cycled with everything in it...

So, Holy Macaroni indeed...That is a very good way to put it...

The reality gap as is between common reality and natural reality simply cannot be sustained an, as such, a discharge will have to occur after a certain threshold is reached...

That is a basic Universal law of energy transfer...

Arching will always occur when a given threshold is reached or breached...

--wirelessguru1
Subject Author Posted

Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Paul H. September 12, 2005 11:39AM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

tanya September 12, 2005 12:19PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Stephanie September 12, 2005 12:45PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

wirelessguru1 September 12, 2005 02:11PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Peski September 12, 2005 02:38PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Stephanie September 12, 2005 03:52PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Peski September 12, 2005 04:21PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Stephanie September 12, 2005 04:37PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

wirelessguru1 September 12, 2005 07:54PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Peski September 13, 2005 12:52PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

wirelessguru1 September 13, 2005 04:34PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Peski September 13, 2005 05:28PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

wirelessguru1 September 13, 2005 06:55PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Jon K September 13, 2005 02:20PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

wirelessguru1 September 13, 2005 04:54PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Pacal September 13, 2005 08:44PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

wirelessguru1 September 13, 2005 09:00PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Pacal September 14, 2005 08:20AM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

wirelessguru1 September 14, 2005 11:31AM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Pacal September 15, 2005 10:12AM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

bernard September 27, 2005 07:41PM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Pete Clarke September 14, 2005 08:54AM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

wirelessguru1 September 14, 2005 11:38AM

Re: Why Bad Science Pervades "Journalism"

Pete Clarke September 16, 2005 03:25AM

Re: Why Over-Reactions Do Not Convince

Dusty September 13, 2005 03:22PM

Re: Why Over-Reactions Do Not Convince

Pete Clarke September 14, 2005 03:08AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login