If creationists and ID'ers invent pseudo arguments to supposedly justify non-science being treated as science (as they undoubtedly do in the most disingenuous and unacceptable way), is there left any room for science to consider itself openly as an ongoing partial attempt to understand the physical elements of a universe that is mostly mysterious ?

Why do so many elements of sub-science consider that thoughts of meaning and purpose in the universe are "unscientific" by definition. What definition is that ? Are they pawns to the creationists or are they lacking in scientific rigour in their thought process ? The "fine tuning" question of theoretical physics only has one answer at present that satisfies Occam's Razor.

Very very few people realise that they don't understand when they think they understand.