Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 6, 2024, 10:31 pm UTC    
April 20, 2005 12:54AM
A couple of things:

#1. "seen from orbit" needs to be qualified: we must know the height of that orbit for the statement to be meaningful.

#2. The optical theory that is usually cited, and from which a calculation can give the minimum size of an object that can be resolved by the eye, refers to roughly circular objects. Because of the physival properties of light, long extended objects can be visible even if their width is apparently below the threshold for resolution. A common example of this (for astronomers) is the visibility of the Cassini division in Saturn's rings in a telescope whose aperture is theoretically unable to resolve its width.

--

Stephen
Subject Author Posted

Great Wall visible in space photo

John Wall April 19, 2005 08:19AM

Re: Great Wall visible in space photo

darkuser April 19, 2005 05:54PM

Re: Great Wall visible in space photo

goaten April 19, 2005 11:04PM

Re: Great Wall visible in space photo

Stephen Tonkin April 20, 2005 12:54AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login