Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

April 30, 2024, 1:38 pm UTC    
February 28, 2005 11:32AM
So its all right to be absurd and ridiculous and insult the intelligence of the viewer? If Return of the Jedi was intended to be a parody / farce the idiocies of the battle on the forest moon of Endor would not matter but it was not intended to be such and so the battle is a joke.

The "its a fantasy" is a cop out because this fantasy doesn't make any sense even in relation to the mythos created in the movie series. No "plausible" reason is given for the Ewoks to win. If the Ewoks were intune with the "force" etc., "plausibility" might be rescued but has it is the outcome is totally mistifying.

I could go into details about the battle that turn it into a silly absurdity, (like the lack of Ewok corpses, and vast abundance of Storm trooper dead), but that would be redundant. Science fiction should have plausibility if only in terms of the world created by the creator of the particular world, the battle on the forest moon of Endor simply lacks it to the point of farce.

Pierre
Subject Author Posted

ET farewell named top tearjerker

John Wall February 14, 2005 04:33AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

laura February 14, 2005 10:31AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 14, 2005 11:09AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

laura February 14, 2005 11:12AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 14, 2005 11:13AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

laura February 14, 2005 11:14AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Pete Clarke February 14, 2005 11:23AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 14, 2005 11:27AM

He?

Joanne February 14, 2005 06:05PM

Re: He?

Marduk February 14, 2005 07:20PM

there you go mar.....

laura February 14, 2005 11:28AM

i found it.....

laura February 14, 2005 11:35AM

Re: i found it.....

Katherine Reece February 14, 2005 11:42AM

Re: i found it.....

lobo-hotei February 14, 2005 11:52AM

Re: i found it.....

laura February 14, 2005 02:28PM

Re: there you go mar.....

Pete Clarke February 15, 2005 03:50AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Warwick L Nixon February 14, 2005 12:19PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

lobo-hotei February 14, 2005 12:35PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Mercury Rapids February 14, 2005 01:04PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Barbara Bajus February 14, 2005 01:27PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

laura February 14, 2005 02:29PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 14, 2005 02:52PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Mercury Rapids February 14, 2005 02:55PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Warwick L Nixon February 14, 2005 04:40PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 14, 2005 07:22PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Warwick L Nixon February 15, 2005 10:25AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 15, 2005 05:55PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Warwick L Nixon February 15, 2005 07:56PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 16, 2005 05:55AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Ritva Kurittu February 16, 2005 09:41AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Mercury Rapids February 16, 2005 09:44AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

cicely February 16, 2005 09:58AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

premalatha balan February 16, 2005 10:00AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

cicely February 16, 2005 10:04AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Mercury Rapids February 16, 2005 10:08AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Mercury Rapids February 16, 2005 10:00AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 17, 2005 07:00AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Pete Clarke February 16, 2005 09:46AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Mercury Rapids February 16, 2005 09:47AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Warwick L Nixon February 16, 2005 10:39AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 17, 2005 07:03AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Warwick L Nixon February 18, 2005 10:44AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 18, 2005 11:50AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Warwick L Nixon February 18, 2005 12:10PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Barbara Bajus February 16, 2005 12:13PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Barbara Bajus February 15, 2005 10:45AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Pete Clarke February 15, 2005 11:01AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Barbara Bajus February 15, 2005 11:08AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Katherine Reece February 15, 2005 11:09AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Barbara Bajus February 15, 2005 11:14AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Warwick L Nixon February 15, 2005 11:23AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Warwick L Nixon February 15, 2005 11:10AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Joanne February 14, 2005 06:08PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Pacal February 15, 2005 08:32PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 16, 2005 05:57AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

darkuser February 16, 2005 11:50AM

erhh....

darkuser February 16, 2005 11:06AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

laura February 16, 2005 11:07AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

darkuser February 16, 2005 11:28AM

and sport....

darkuser February 16, 2005 11:13AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Roxana February 16, 2005 01:25PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Pacal February 17, 2005 07:59PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Marduk February 18, 2005 06:44AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Mercury Rapids February 18, 2005 06:58AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Pacal February 23, 2005 02:03PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Mercury Rapids February 23, 2005 02:46PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Pacal February 23, 2005 07:51PM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Mercury Rapids February 24, 2005 06:37AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Pacal February 28, 2005 11:32AM

Re: ET farewell named top tearjerker

Mercury Rapids February 28, 2005 11:35AM

or...

Warwick L Nixon February 28, 2005 12:08PM

Re: or...

Pete Clarke March 01, 2005 03:56AM

Re: or...

Mercury Rapids March 01, 2005 05:11AM

Re: or...

Pacal March 03, 2005 07:30PM

Ahhhhh....But.....

Warwick L Nixon February 24, 2005 10:46AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

Mercury Rapids February 24, 2005 10:57AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

Pete Clarke February 28, 2005 07:46AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

Mercury Rapids February 28, 2005 08:05AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

Pete Clarke February 28, 2005 09:05AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

laura February 28, 2005 09:08AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

cicely February 28, 2005 09:33AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

laura February 28, 2005 09:34AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

cicely February 28, 2005 09:37AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

Pete Clarke February 28, 2005 09:42AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

laura February 28, 2005 09:47AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

Mercury Rapids February 28, 2005 09:49AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

laura February 28, 2005 09:53AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

Pete Clarke February 28, 2005 09:56AM

Re: Ahhhhh....But.....

laura February 28, 2005 09:57AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login