Dave L Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is wasn't me that intoduced academic
> qualifications:
>
> And on his first post he wrote:
>
> "Before begining my study of religion I was
> interested in the von Daniken theories and Cayce
> as well. Now I feel I have come full circle and
> recently wrote a paper that dealt with the Ark of
> the Covenant in Ethiopia, an issue Hancock has
> published on"
That was an introduction (not my first post either) and was in reference to my reaction to the piece that lead my to this site in
Archaeological Fantasies, in which Kat describes similar evolution of beliefs.
>
> So Ama just sayin....surely it's a bit much to
> come in with an intro like that and then say:
>
> "This seems to be just some pseudohistorical
> bashing of people with real scholarly
> backgrounds"
1) I have taken this back and apologized based my my missreading
2) Your attacks on people and theories for being anthropological etc fits at least one proposed definition.
This was not an insult it was a look at one method you have been using.