February 24, 2005 07:41AM
|
Registered: 19 years ago
Posts: 3,874
|
Generally, as I understand it, unless a law specifically refers to a particular person or class of persons as excluded then they are, de facto, included.
That's why there was a specific section on the Royal Family in the original Act.
I personally don't see any conflict with the religious role either - the Sovereign is also head of state and all Acts of Parliament are enacted by the Crown. She's "in charge" of Church weddings because the ordination of C of E vicars derives from her authority and she's in charge of civil weddings because the authority of registrars to perform marriages also derives from the Crown.
Pete
God is our guide! from field, from wave, From plough, from anvil, and from loom; We come, our country's rights to save, And speak a tyrant faction's doom: We raise the watch-word liberty; We will, we will,we will be free!
Subject |
Author |
Posted |
|
laura |
February 23, 2005 02:59AM |
|
Dave L |
February 23, 2005 04:38AM |
|
Mercury Rapids |
February 23, 2005 05:42AM |
|
laura |
February 23, 2005 06:15AM |
|
Anonymous User |
February 23, 2005 10:12AM |
|
Pete Clarke |
February 23, 2005 06:55AM |
|
John Wall |
February 23, 2005 08:45AM |
|
Pete Clarke |
February 23, 2005 09:30AM |
|
John Wall |
February 23, 2005 09:32AM |
|
Mercury Rapids |
February 23, 2005 09:33AM |
|
John Wall |
February 23, 2005 09:34AM |
|
Simon |
February 23, 2005 08:44PM |
|
Pete Clarke |
February 24, 2005 03:44AM |
|
Warwick L Nixon |
February 24, 2005 11:03AM |
|
Doug Weller |
February 23, 2005 07:34AM |
|
laura |
February 23, 2005 09:09AM |
|
Warwick L Nixon |
February 24, 2005 10:51AM |
|
Anonymous User |
February 23, 2005 10:21AM |
|
Pete Clarke |
February 23, 2005 10:50AM |
|
Stephanie |
February 23, 2005 01:58PM |
|
Doug Weller |
February 23, 2005 02:12PM |
|
lobo-hotei |
February 23, 2005 02:20PM |
|
Pete Clarke |
February 24, 2005 03:40AM |
|
laura |
February 23, 2005 03:42PM |
|
Katherine Reece |
February 23, 2005 03:46PM |
|
laura |
February 23, 2005 05:04PM |
|
Doug Weller |
February 23, 2005 05:25PM |
|
John Wall |
February 23, 2005 07:14PM |
|
laura |
February 24, 2005 03:12AM |
|
Pete Clarke |
February 24, 2005 03:41AM |
|
laura |
February 24, 2005 03:45AM |
|
Pete Clarke |
February 24, 2005 04:46AM |
|
laura |
February 24, 2005 04:50AM |
|
Doug Weller |
February 24, 2005 07:26AM |
|
laura |
February 24, 2005 07:31AM |
|
Pete Clarke |
February 24, 2005 07:41AM |
|
laura |
February 24, 2005 07:49AM |
|
Doug Weller |
February 24, 2005 07:57AM |
|
laura |
February 24, 2005 07:59AM |
|
Pete Clarke |
February 24, 2005 08:14AM |
|
laura |
February 24, 2005 08:18AM |
|
Pete Clarke |
February 24, 2005 09:13AM |
|
Doug Weller |
February 24, 2005 09:16AM |
|
Warwick L Nixon |
February 24, 2005 10:59AM |
|
Mercury Rapids |
February 27, 2005 07:41AM |
|
laura |
February 27, 2005 08:31AM |
|
Mercury Rapids |
February 27, 2005 08:34AM |
|
laura |
February 27, 2005 08:37AM |
|
Mercury Rapids |
February 27, 2005 08:42AM |
|
laura |
February 27, 2005 08:50AM |
|
Mercury Rapids |
February 27, 2005 08:57AM |
|
laura |
February 27, 2005 09:00AM |
|
Mercury Rapids |
February 27, 2005 09:02AM |
|
laura |
February 27, 2005 09:03AM |
|
laura |
February 27, 2005 09:03AM |
|
Mercury Rapids |
February 27, 2005 09:13AM |
|
laura |
February 27, 2005 09:22AM |
|
laura |
February 27, 2005 09:22AM |
|
Warwick L Nixon |
February 27, 2005 11:03AM |
|
laura |
February 27, 2005 01:23PM |
|
Warwick L Nixon |
February 27, 2005 03:09PM |
|
Mercury Rapids |
February 27, 2005 03:19PM |
|
Mercury Rapids |
February 27, 2005 01:41PM |
|
laura |
February 27, 2005 05:01PM |