<HTML>My problem is not with Gauri per se - after all, he has proposed a serious scientific hypothesis. Likewise Harrell. And likewise Reader <i>and</i> Schoch. And Jordan, to his credit recognises this. The debating over the Sphinx is based upon Science, not upon wishful flights of fancy of various people...you know who... To be honest, all this geological based stuff is a refreshing change from the ramblings of Sitchin and the like...
My only quibble with Jordan is over the wording that he used in the pages dealing with Schoch...I wasn't entirely confortable with them...
Of course, maybe that's a personal thing and reflective of my own position [1]
Best Regards,
Dave
[1] That the Sphinx is somewhat older than the conventional date...</HTML>
