<HTML>Again you're mixing up things.
Krupp's position is that Bauval/Gilbert/Hancock say that the northen shafts were targetted on northern shafts and the southern shafts were targetted on southern stars.
If the above is a stated position then Giza is upside down.
If the directionality from the shafts is "removed" then it doesn't matter which way up Giza is. Krupp wrote:
"Had Bauval and Gilbert ignored the shaft alignments and simply said three pyramids in a line equal three stars in a row, their argument would have been unfalsifiable and logically uninteresting. I would have left it alone."
Will RB accept that the shafts aren't "star shafts" ?
John</HTML>