| May 22, 2024, 9:27 pm UTC |
 |
| In: The Hall of Maat > Ancient History - Ancient History and Archaeology > Topic |
| Goto: Forum List • Create A New Profile • Log In |
|
Ancient History •
Ancient Egypt •
Laboratory •
Humanities •
Apocalypse •
Paper Lens •
Coffee Shop Exhibitions, Conferences, Lectures, Journals • Alternative Geometry and Numerology |
| September 26, 2001 12:42PM |
<HTML>Hi Garret.
I assume you mean the 15% error? If so, then you'd be speaking to Robert, yes?
That particular point has been acknowledged by all (Robert too!) as entirely negligible.
That being history, I'm wondering if you might have meant my own opinion. (Yes? No?). Have you had a chance to read it? Just so you know ahead of time, it is neither a trivial point, nor one that only deals with a minor portion (in turn, leaving the full theory intact), rather, my brief review clearly refutes the <I>entire</I> theory by Dr Spence. If I may say, this isn't the only problem; there are <I>four other entirely different points</I> which turn the idea down, and have as much singular power as that of the 'missing data/erroneous data' opinion which I supplied (i.e. they'd stand alone without a need for a support framework). Unfortunately, I won't be presenting them here. Besides, there's no need; my rebuttal does the work by itself. Would you like the link?
Avry</HTML>
I assume you mean the 15% error? If so, then you'd be speaking to Robert, yes?
That particular point has been acknowledged by all (Robert too!) as entirely negligible.
That being history, I'm wondering if you might have meant my own opinion. (Yes? No?). Have you had a chance to read it? Just so you know ahead of time, it is neither a trivial point, nor one that only deals with a minor portion (in turn, leaving the full theory intact), rather, my brief review clearly refutes the <I>entire</I> theory by Dr Spence. If I may say, this isn't the only problem; there are <I>four other entirely different points</I> which turn the idea down, and have as much singular power as that of the 'missing data/erroneous data' opinion which I supplied (i.e. they'd stand alone without a need for a support framework). Unfortunately, I won't be presenting them here. Besides, there's no need; my rebuttal does the work by itself. Would you like the link?
Avry</HTML>
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.