<HTML>Dear Duncan,
You have good reason to be scared, but not of me. When big media like BBC and responsible programmes like Horizon start messing around in this way, then there is, indeed, good reason to be scared. The really scarry thing in this fiasco of the BBC was that they pretended they were being 'fair and unbiased' all along, when it was plain to all that it was designed as a hatchet job on GH and I. But let's put this to rest, as so much was said on this affair in the last two years.
You asked me: "Presumably you would now agree that the rescreened Atlantis Reborn was both fairly produced and presented?"
Yes, but only insofar that it was more fair than the original programme. The revised version still fell a long way short of the mark; for example in not allowing a balanced rebuttal to Krupp to be made by astronomers such as Seymour, Wickramsinghe or Archie Roy. The revised version also failed to present the star correlation theory properly, such as not discussing the PT and Orion or showing the alignment to Orion's belt of the southern shaft of the KC. I know Chris Hale has come up with all sorts of reasons why and why not about this; but I simply don't buy them. It's just editing-room double-talk.
Best,
Robert</HTML>
