Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

April 30, 2024, 6:44 am UTC    
March 16, 2021 01:49PM
Nothing new to see here - just an incredibly careless rehash of Martin Sweatman's same old nonsense. The "scientists from Edinburgh and Kent" are, of course, Sweatman (engineer) and Coombes (Religious Studies grad student with Theosophical leanings). One of the illustrations is borrowed from an entirely different and contradictory astronomical interpretation of cave art, that of Chantal Jégues-Wolkiewiez. And how, pray tell, is the ivory Lowenmensch figurine from nearly 40K years ago supposed to commemorate an asteroid impact 11K years ago? BTW, as far as I know, Martin Sweatman hasn't released any new "peer-reviewed" papers recently, though he has written some remarkably silly articles for Ancient Origins.
Subject Author Posted

40,000-year-old star maps?

Hermione March 16, 2021 03:24AM

Re: 40,000-year-old star maps?

Hermione March 16, 2021 03:28AM

Re: 40,000-year-old star maps?

Rebby March 16, 2021 01:49PM

Re: 40,000-year-old star maps?

Byrd March 19, 2021 12:48PM

Gobekli Tepe art is archetype, not a zodiac [2019 update]

Hermione March 22, 2021 04:00AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login